Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 years later than the W320 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the W320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W320
XZ-2 iHS | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 36 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W320 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W320
XZ-2 iHS | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the W320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and W320 is 85 and 97 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and W320.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony W320 will give extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $269 |