Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W350 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W350 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years after the W350 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the W350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W350
XZ-2 iHS | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W350 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W350
XZ-2 iHS | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W350 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the W350.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and W350 is 85 and 97 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and W350.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony W350 will produce extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W350 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $200 |