Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-104mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 119g - 96 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W510 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W510 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 24 months later than the W510 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W510 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the W510 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony W510 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W510
| XZ-2 iHS | W510 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W510 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| W510 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W510
| XZ-2 iHS | W510 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony W510 has sizing of 96mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 119 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the W510.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and W510 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and W510.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS offers the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W510 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 2.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 119 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 54 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $450 | $99 |