Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 110g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W560, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W560 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W560 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 24 months after the W560 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W560 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the W560 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony W560 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W560
XZ-2 iHS | W560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W560 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W560 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W560
XZ-2 iHS | W560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony W560 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W560 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the W560.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and W560 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and W560.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Sony W560 will show extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W560 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 110g (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $450 | $139 |