Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
- 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced February 2014
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W800, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and W800 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W800 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 14 months before the W800 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the W800 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony W800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W800
XZ-2 iHS | W800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W800 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | December 2012 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W800
XZ-2 iHS | W800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony W800 has proportions of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W800 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the W800.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and W800 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and W800.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony W800 will render more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W800 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVI MPEG4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $90 |