Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
39 Features
38 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-168mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 161g - 95 x 54 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WX10 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WX10 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 24 months later than the WX10 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the WX10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony WX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony WX10
XZ-2 iHS | WX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WX10 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX10
XZ-2 iHS | WX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony WX10 has proportions of 95mm x 54mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WX10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WX10 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WX10.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony WX10 will deliver more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX10 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-168mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 161 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 95 x 54 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $200 |