Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 front
Portability
94
Imaging
43
Features
43
Overall
43

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Sony WX350
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2014
  • Replaced the Sony WX300
  • Replacement is Sony WX500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX350, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WX350 (18MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WX350 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The XZ-2 iHS was announced 14 months before the WX350 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the WX350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony WX350

 XZ-2 iHS WX350 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX350 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 WX350 XZ-2 iHS 
RevealedFebruary 2014December 2012More recent by 14 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX350

 XZ-2 iHS WX350 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony WX350 has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).

Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WX350.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WX350 is 85 and 94 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The visual below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WX350.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony WX350 will provide you with more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Sony WX350
46
focusing manually
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
37
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Street photography camera
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (164g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography factors
Sony WX350 Sports photography factors
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery life (340 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
52
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 shots)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Sony WX350
61
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
72
better than average battery (470 shots)
lighter than average (164 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
Sony WX350 Landscape photography advice
55
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse function
47
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Sony WX350 as a Vlogging camera
36
really wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes microphone socket
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (346g)
35
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (164 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX350
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-12-18 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 18MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 12800 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 35 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 25-500mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.5-6.5
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 4.30 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346g (0.76 lb) 164g (0.36 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 shots 470 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $450 $270