Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 114g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WX70 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WX70 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 11 months after the WX70 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the WX70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony WX70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony WX70
| XZ-2 iHS | WX70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony WX70 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WX70 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX70
| XZ-2 iHS | WX70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony WX70 has measurements of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the WX70.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WX70 is 85 and 97 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The image below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WX70.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony WX70 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX70 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | XtraFine TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 114 gr (0.25 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $450 | $242 |
