Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
40 Features
38 Overall
39
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
- 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX80, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WX80 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WX80 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was launched around the same time to the WX80 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the WX80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony WX80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony WX80
XZ-2 iHS | WX80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX80 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WX80 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX80
XZ-2 iHS | WX80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | January 2013 | Same generation | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony WX80 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX80 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WX80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WX80 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WX80.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony WX80 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX80 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-8.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 240 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $276 |