Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A35 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A35 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 16 months after the A35 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony SLT-A35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A35
| XZ-2 iHS | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | September 2011 | Newer by 16 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A35 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A35
| XZ-2 iHS | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the A35.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A35 is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A35.
All in all, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A35 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 415 grams (0.91 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 440 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $450 | $598 |