Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Superseded the Sony A33
  • Newer Model is Sony A37
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Overview

The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A35 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A35 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The XZ-2 iHS was launched 16 months after the A35 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A35

 XZ-2 iHS A35 
ReleasedDecember 2012September 2011Newer by 16 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A35 XZ-2 iHS 
Display resolution921k920kCrisper display (+1k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A35

 XZ-2 iHS A35 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the A35.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A35 is 85 and 69 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A35.

All in all, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A35 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography details
Sony A35 Portrait photography details
46
you can focus manually
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
73
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Sony A35 as a Street photography camera
66
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
more heavy than others in class (346g)
71
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than average (415g)
great ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Sony A35
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
great battery life (340 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
61
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
terrible battery pack (440 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography features
Sony A35 Travel photography features
61
great battery life (340 CIPA)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (346g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
58
lighter than average (415 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (440 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Landscape photography with Sony A35
55
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (340 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
no Timelapse mode
69
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
terrible battery pack (440 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging information
Sony A35 Vlogging information
36
relatively wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes microphone socket
does not posses selfie friendly display
more heavy than others in class (346g)
36
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external mic support
lighter than average (415 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A35
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony SLT-A35
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony SLT-A35
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2012-12-18 2011-09-20
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 12800 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 12.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 grams (0.76 lbs) 415 grams (0.91 lbs)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 74
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 12.7
DXO Low light score 216 763
Other
Battery life 340 images 440 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $450 $598