Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e32d/7e32ded8c29091f177b6d094955d90e439bda6e0" alt="Sony SLT-A65 front Sony SLT-A65 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Announced November 2011
- Replacement is Sony A68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A65, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A65 (24MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A65 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was launched 14 months later than the A65 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the A65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony SLT-A65. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A65
XZ-2 iHS | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | November 2011 | More recent by 14 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A65 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A65
XZ-2 iHS | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the A65.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/913eb/913eb6eda0a3e184b42fce0dd61c24c0c23ee003" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and A65 is 85 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6b01/b6b01c8813d7b736393a33559f7dbb9421a5905c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and A65.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A65 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ece6f/ece6fdc455ae1dea9c029c9442b6a4b148ec4ca9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bb0d/9bb0d3f272de7f0d7e502b2127d9684444a11066" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony SLT-A65 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 622g (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 560 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $450 | $700 |