Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2015
- Succeeded the Sony A65
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A68, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A68 (24MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A68 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 3 years before the A68 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the A68 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony SLT-A68. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A68
XZ-2 iHS | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A68 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2015 | December 2012 | Newer by 35 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A68
XZ-2 iHS | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony A68 has specifications of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A68 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the A68.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A68 is 85 and 64 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and A68.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony A68 will provide greater detail having an extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A68 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony SLT-A68 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 79 |
Cross type focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 610 grams (1.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 510 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $450 | $581 |