Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Launched February 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Panasonic GX9 versus Panasonic FX75, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the GX9 (20MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the GX9 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GX9 was revealed 7 years after the FX75 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GX9 grades versus the FX75 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic GX9 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Panasonic FX75
GX9 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | June 2010 | More modern by 94 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Panasonic GX9
FX75 | GX9 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic GX9 and Panasonic FX75
GX9 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Panasonic GX9 features external dimensions of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") having a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic GX9 versus Panasonic FX75 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the GX9 and the FX75.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GX9 and FX75 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GX9 and FX75.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GX9 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic GX9 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher GX9 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,240k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | 7.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 407 grams (0.90 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,000 | $139 |