Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d5a/92d5aaf7d395530441c4baf1340786d20e9e4aff" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Released February 2018
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the GX9 (20MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the GX9 (Four Thirds) and GX-1S (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GX9 was introduced 12 years after the GX-1S which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the GX9 scores against the GX-1S for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic GX9 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Samsung GX-1S
GX9 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2006 | More modern by 148 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer screen (+1030k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Panasonic GX9
GX-1S | GX9 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic GX9 and Samsung GX-1S
GX9 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic GX9 features exterior measurements of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") with a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the GX9 compared to the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98145/98145fc7a37cfdb5b2571fca1d22c463b934a301" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GX9 and GX-1S is 82 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f02f/4f02f2196adf8f13447214e1009d7b0e3698eac0" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GX9 and GX-1S.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GX9 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Panasonic GX9 will offer you extra detail using its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher GX9 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c713c/c713ce2a69bee42075e312fd42d972c4643b109c" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3e3/cd3e37595a6ac472c858f2c83b6320edf783b6b4" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Samsung GX-1S |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2018-02-13 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,240k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 407g (0.90 lb) | 605g (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $1,000 | $850 |