Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d5a/92d5aaf7d395530441c4baf1340786d20e9e4aff" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26f126ddb897ecf80630f38a706a60c1b9d696" alt="Samsung NX30 front Samsung NX30 front"
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Launched February 2018
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Launched January 2014
- Replaced the Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Panasonic GX9 versus Samsung NX30, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GX9 (20MP) and the NX30 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the GX9 (Four Thirds) and NX30 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GX9 was launched 4 years after the NX30 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the GX9 scores versus the NX30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 & Samsung NX30. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic GX9 Gallery & Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Samsung NX30
GX9 | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 51 months |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1036k | Sharper screen (+204k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Panasonic GX9
NX30 | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Panasonic GX9 and Samsung NX30
GX9 | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic GX9 has external measurements of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") having a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Samsung NX30 has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") along with a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic GX9 versus Samsung NX30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the GX9 compared to the NX30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43535/43535cace0958118c9594e27a11698b574288f86" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GX9 and NX30 is 82 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2712d/2712d1028da056d7a2e4503a26b41f777a3a22e7" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GX9 and NX30.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The GX9 has got the tinier sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging. The more modern GX9 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9948d/9948d70b5ed10dcdfbde05eca2ddca5abc0ea759" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e62fd/e62fd046e31061ed6bc0b26bc1664a8e0a6a9a1f" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Samsung NX30 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,240k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 407g (0.90 lbs) | 375g (0.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | 360 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,000 | $699 |