Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced November 2011
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Panasonic ZS200 versus Panasonic 3D1, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and 3D1 (12MP) and the ZS200 (1") and 3D1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ZS200 was released 6 years later than the 3D1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the ZS200 grades versus the 3D1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic 3D1
ZS200 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | November 2011 | Fresher by 77 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1240k | 460k | Clearer display (+780k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Panasonic ZS200
3D1 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic 3D1
ZS200 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS200 offers exterior measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) and the Panasonic 3D1 has proportions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZS200 versus Panasonic 3D1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the ZS200 and the 3D1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and 3D1 is 86 and 93 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS200 and 3D1.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The ZS200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The newer ZS200 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2018-02-13 | 2011-11-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 1,240 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340g (0.75 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | 200 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $800 | $670 |