Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS35
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Panasonic ZS200 versus Panasonic FH25, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the ZS200 (1") and FH25 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ZS200 was manufactured 7 years later than the FH25 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the ZS200 matches up vs the FH25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic FH25
ZS200 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | January 2011 | More recent by 87 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Clearer display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Panasonic ZS200
FH25 | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic FH25
ZS200 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZS200 offers outer measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Panasonic FH25 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic ZS200 versus Panasonic FH25 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the ZS200 against the FH25.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and FH25 is 86 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS200 and FH25.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ZS200 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will give extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern ZS200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,240 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 pictures | 250 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $800 | $180 |