Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Panasonic ZS200 versus Panasonic FX75, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the ZS200 (1") and FX75 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The ZS200 was released 7 years after the FX75 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the ZS200 matches up against the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic FX75
ZS200 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 94 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1010k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Panasonic ZS200
FX75 | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic FX75
ZS200 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZS200 offers physical dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic ZS200 versus Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the ZS200 and the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95fce/95fcee7e220ca5aeadd568af2dd5dd8883818784" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and FX75 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b542a/b542a395c916b31fde8a6f56e00e1543fe227c27" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS200 and FX75.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The ZS200 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher ZS200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4877/c487701fd3a78515c791895dbfa9876031d403f0" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2bec/e2bec006a39ebd3de169434c5c161c1f0231deff" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also Known as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,240k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $800 | $139 |