Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Launched April 2019
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic G95, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both built by Panasonic. The resolution of the ZS200 (20MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is fairly well matched but the ZS200 (1") and G95 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe ZS200 was brought out 13 months before the G95 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the ZS200 scores versus the G95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic G95
ZS200 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Panasonic ZS200
G95 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2019 | February 2018 | More modern by 13 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic G95
ZS200 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 1240k | Exact same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS200 has got outer measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic G95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the ZS200 versus the G95.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and G95 is 86 and 67 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS200 and G95.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The ZS200 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic G95 will resolve extra detail having its extra 0.3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged ZS200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,240k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) | 536 gr (1.18 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | 290 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $800 | $998 |