Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
90 Imaging
54 Features
70 Overall
60
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are built by Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and GX850 (16MP) and the ZS200 (1") and GX850 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ZS200 was launched 14 months after the GX850 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic GX850 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the ZS200 grades versus the GX850 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery & Panasonic GX850 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic GX850
| ZS200 | GX850 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | January 2017 | More modern by 14 months |
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 1040k | Sharper screen (+200k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX850 over the Panasonic ZS200
| GX850 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic GX850
| ZS200 | GX850 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS200 has got external measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) and the Panasonic GX850 has specifications of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the ZS200 compared to the GX850.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ZS200 and GX850 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ZS200 and GX850.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The ZS200 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher ZS200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Panasonic |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 |
| Also called as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2018-02-13 | 2017-01-04 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4592 x 3448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 80 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,240 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 586 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 photographs | 210 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $800 | $548 |