Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the ZS200 (1") and ZR3 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ZS200 was unveiled 8 years later than the ZR3 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the ZS200 grades vs the ZR3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic ZR3
ZS200 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2010 | More recent by 98 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Clearer display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Panasonic ZS200
ZR3 | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic ZR3
ZS200 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS200 enjoys external dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the ZS200 versus the ZR3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZS200 and ZR3 is 86 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The graphic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS200 and ZR3.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ZS200 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will render extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern ZS200 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Also called as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2010-01-26 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,240 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $800 | $280 |