Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Panasonic ZS200 versus Ricoh CX3, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and CX3 (10MP) and the ZS200 (1") and CX3 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The ZS200 was manufactured 7 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the ZS200 grades against the CX3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Ricoh CX3
ZS200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 94 months |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+320k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Panasonic ZS200
CX3 | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Ricoh CX3
ZS200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZS200 has got outer dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Panasonic ZS200 versus Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the ZS200 against the CX3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf8cf/cf8cf4980b3b6df286c38b320d951d1783112abe" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZS200 and CX3 is 86 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4b31/b4b314a84e996baeac5c2ddbfee376bec3ed1113" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS200 and CX3.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The ZS200 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger ZS200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0c82/c0c8220236e71e6cf9face56ccecf5431225f700" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25895/25895692968b162fa09846fdc56ee9c05add5e5f" alt="Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Ricoh CX3 |
Also called as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-02-13 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,240k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $329 |