Clicky

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
86
Imaging
53
Features
66
Overall
58
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the ZS200 (1") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The ZS200 was brought out 8 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the ZS200 grades vs the GR Digital III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 ZS200 GR Digital III 
LaunchedFebruary 2018July 2009Newer by 105 months
Display resolution1240k920kClearer display (+320k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic ZS200

 GR Digital III ZS200 

Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 ZS200 GR Digital III 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS200 offers physical dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Compare the Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the ZS200 compared to the GR Digital III.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and GR Digital III is 86 and 92 respectively.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS200 and GR Digital III.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The ZS200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher ZS200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
65
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
has face detect focus
supports RAW files
no external flash support
40
manual focus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Panasonic ZS200
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
77
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports RAW files
has focus by touch
screen is fixed
55
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Sports photography camera
70
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
has tracking focus
good battery pack (370 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
76
good battery pack (370 shots)
supports bluetooth
has focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
63
has built in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS200
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
69
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports RAW files
good battery pack (370 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
45
manual focus
good max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3")
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging details
35
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone jack
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic ZS200 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Manufacturer Panasonic Ricoh
Model type Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 Ricoh GR Digital III
Also called Lumix DC-TZ200 -
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2018-02-13 2009-07-27
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Venus Engine GR engine III
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size 1" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 13.2 x 8.8mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 116.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 5472 x 3648 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 125 64
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 80 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 49 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-360mm (15.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.3-6.4 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 2.7 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,240k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,330k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.53x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 340 gr (0.75 pounds) 208 gr (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 370 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $800 $399