Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the ZS200 (1") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.

The ZS200 was brought out 8 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the ZS200 grades vs the GR Digital III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
ZS200 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 105 months |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+320k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic ZS200
GR Digital III | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Ricoh GR Digital III
ZS200 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS200 offers physical dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the ZS200 compared to the GR Digital III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and GR Digital III is 86 and 92 respectively.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS200 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The ZS200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher ZS200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Also called | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-13 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | GR engine III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,240k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $800 | $399 |