Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Panasonic ZS200 and Samsung HZ35W, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the ZS200 (1") and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ZS200 was introduced 7 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the ZS200 grades against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Samsung HZ35W
ZS200 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | June 2010 | More recent by 94 months | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 614k | Sharper screen (+626k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Panasonic ZS200
HZ35W | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Samsung HZ35W
ZS200 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS200 has got outside dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Panasonic ZS200 and Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the ZS200 against the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the ZS200 and HZ35W is 86 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS200 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ZS200 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will give you extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer ZS200 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | WB650 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-02-13 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,240 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $800 | $300 |