Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Panasonic ZS200 versus Sony A300, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Panasonic and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and A300 (10MP) and the ZS200 (1") and A300 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ZS200 was brought out 10 years later than the A300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the ZS200 grades vs the A300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Sony A300
ZS200 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2008 | More recent by 123 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Panasonic ZS200
A300 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Sony A300
ZS200 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic ZS200 comes with outer dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic ZS200 versus Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the ZS200 versus the A300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the ZS200 and A300 is 86 and 64 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS200 and A300.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ZS200 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will give greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern ZS200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2018-02-13 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,240k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 pounds) | 632 grams (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $800 | $0 |