Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Panasonic and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the ZS200 (1") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ZS200 was revealed 6 years after the NEX-C3 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the ZS200 grades against the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are available at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Sony NEX-C3
ZS200 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | August 2011 | Newer by 79 months | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 920k | Clearer screen (+320k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Panasonic ZS200
NEX-C3 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Sony NEX-C3
ZS200 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS200 features exterior measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the ZS200 vs the NEX-C3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZS200 and NEX-C3 is 86 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the ZS200 and NEX-C3.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The ZS200 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent ZS200 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Also called as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2018-02-13 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,240 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 shots | 400 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $800 | $343 |