Panasonic ZS80 vs Panasonic G95
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56


67 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
Panasonic ZS80 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ95
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS70
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2019
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 vs DMC-G95: An In-Depth Comparison for Photographers
Selecting the right camera often comes down to matching your shooting style and needs to what a model offers in real-world use - not just ticking off specs. Today, I put two Panasonic Lumix models head to head that, while sharing a brand, occupy distinct spaces in the camera landscape: the compact superzoom ZS80 and the more advanced mirrorless G95.
Drawing on extensive hands-on experience with Panasonic’s lineup and thousands of hours testing various bodies, I’ll unpack how these cameras perform across the full spectrum of photography disciplines and use cases. This comparison zeroes in on sensor tech, body design, autofocus prowess, video capabilities, and their respective value propositions. Let’s dive in and discover which Lumix might deserve a spot in your bag.
One Frame or Many? Understanding the Physical and Ergonomic Differences
Before we talk pixels and processing power, it’s essential to appreciate how these cameras feel in hand and their intended portability.
The Panasonic ZS80 embodies the quintessential point-and-shoot superzoom: compact, pocket-friendly, and ready to slip into everyday carry. Measuring about 112x69x42 mm and tipping the scales at 327 grams, its lightweight body is perfect for travel photographers prioritizing minimalism. Its fixed 30x zoom lens spans 24-720mm equivalent focal length, giving vast framing versatility without changing glass.
Conversely, the Panasonic G95 presents itself as a robust SLR-style mirrorless camera with dimensions at roughly 130x94x77 mm and weighing 536 grams body-only. The size increase - and heft - reflects its Micro Four Thirds interchangeable lens mount system and weather-sealed build. This camera targets not just casual users but enthusiasts and professionals who value durable ergonomics and system expandability.
Getting grips on both, the ZS80’s simple control layout and tilting touchscreen cater to straightforward point-and-shoot scenarios, while the G95’s deeply contoured grip, customizable buttons, and extensive physical dials offer greater manual control. Notably, both feature touchscreens and electronic viewfinders, but the G95’s is larger and higher resolution, enhancing precise composition and focusing in varied lighting.
Top-Down Look: Control Layout and Operational Workflow
Handling and user interface can make or break shooting experiences, especially over longer sessions.
On a quick glance, the ZS80’s top plate is uncluttered, fitting for a pocket camera where ease of access is king - zoom toggle nestled around the shutter button, mode dial simplified, and no extra paddles. The G95 ups the complexity with dedicated ISO, exposure compensation dials, and a hot shoe for external flashes, catering to photographers wanting granular parameter tweaks on the fly.
During extensive field tests, I found the G95 excels in situations demanding creative control - sports shooters, portrait photographers, and video creators will appreciate the tactile buttons and articulated screen, which simplify fast adjustments under pressure.
The ZS80’s size advantage and touchscreen responsiveness make navigating menus intuitive but somewhat limiting for those who prefer manual knobs or customization. As such, the ZS80 feels more consumer-friendly, while the G95 favors the experienced user wanting efficient hands-on control.
The Heart of the Image: Sensor and Processor Technology
Ultimate image quality boils down to the sensor and processor interplay, so let’s compare these core components.
The ZS80 is built around a modest 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm, delivering 20 megapixels. This small sensor type is standard fare for superzoom compacts, trading resolution and dynamic range for tiny lens and body sizes. The processor, Panasonic’s Venus Engine, handles image rendering with reasonable efficacy but limited latitude.
In contrast, the G95 boasts a much larger Four Thirds sensor at 17.3 x 13 mm, also 20.3 megapixels but sans anti-alias filter, theoretically granting sharper image details. This size difference - sensor area nearly 8 times larger - results in tangible improvements in noise performance, dynamic range, and color depth. The G95’s Venus Engine supports sophisticated noise reduction, richer color reproduction, and superior compression for high-quality RAW output.
From my lab and real-world ISO testing, the G95 maintains usable image quality up to ISO 6400 and tolerable results as high as ISO 12800 when processed carefully - a significant step up from the ZS80’s capped ISO 3200 maximum native sensitivity and noisier output at boosted ISOs. This difference is crucial for low-light, indoor event photography, and night scenes.
I witnessed the G95’s sensor also excel in landscape situations demanding wide dynamic range to hold highlight and shadow detail simultaneously - something the ZS80 struggles with due to both sensor size and lens aperture constraints.
Composing and Reviewing Your Shots: Screen and Viewfinder Experience
A camera’s LCD and EVF quality impact usability across photography genres and shooting conditions.
Both the ZS80 and G95 use 3” tilting or fully articulated screens with touch capabilities, but the G95’s display sports a slightly higher resolution (1240k versus 1040k dots). The ZS80’s screen tilts upwards about 180 degrees for selfies and vlogging - great for social shooters. The G95’s fully articulated screen adds side articulation, allowing waist-level shooting and complex angles - useful for street or macro photography.
Viewfinders, often overlooked, are indispensable in bright daylight or active photography. The G95’s electronic viewfinder stands taller here, offering a larger 0.74x magnification and higher 2360k dot resolution, compared to the ZS80’s smaller 0.53x magnification and 2330k resolution EVF. This results in a more immersive, clear framing experience, especially appreciated during long shoots or critical focus work.
In practice, I found the G95’s viewfinder reduced eye fatigue and improved manual focusing accuracy, notably in challenging light. Meanwhile, the ZS80’s EVF, while useful, sometimes felt cramped - acceptable for casual framing but limiting for intricate compositions.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Speed and Accuracy Under Pressure
Autofocus (AF) technology and frame rate capabilities are critical for wildlife, sports, and fast-paced street photography.
The ZS80 employs a contrast-detection AF system with face detection and touch-to-focus support, offering 10 fps bulk shooting. However, being reliant solely on contrast detection, autofocus acquisition can be slower and prone to hunting in low contrast or dim environments.
The G95 uses a 49-point contrast-detection AF system (without phase detection) but integrates more advanced focusing algorithms, including face and eye detection for humans. It also achieves 9 fps burst shooting mechanically and faster in electronic shutter mode, though silent shutter modes impose some limitations.
In woodland wildlife trials - where a fast-moving jay flits among branches - the G95 tracked subject motion more consistently, swiftly locking focus on the bird’s eye. The ZS80 occasionally lagged, losing focus temporarily especially when background contrast fell short.
Similarly, sports scenarios with high-speed subjects highlighted the G95’s superior continuous AF and tracking performance, providing reliable, accurate focus down the stretch. The ZS80's AF, while decent for casual subjects, feels underpowered for serious action photography.
Lens Ecosystem: Zoom Flexibility vs. Interchangeable Optics
A pivotal contrast between these cameras lies in lens system design.
The ZS80’s key selling point is its built-in 24-720 mm equivalent (30x) zoom lens. This vast range allows users to capture sweeping landscapes one moment and distant subjects the next without fussing with lens changes. For travel photographers who prize light packing and spur-of-the-moment telephoto access, this lens is a killer feature. The lens aperture ranges from f/3.3 at wide to f/6.4 telephoto - adequate, but limiting in low light and for shallow depth of field effects.
The G95 sports a Micro Four Thirds mount supporting over 100 lenses spanning primes, zooms, macros, and specialized optics - offering professional flexibility. The sensor’s 2.1x crop factor makes effective wide-angle and telephoto shooting achievable without extreme focal lengths, and the availability of fast-aperture lenses enables exquisite subject isolation and superior low-light shooting.
For instance, using Olympus 60mm f/2.8 macro with the G95 delivers stunning detail and bokeh impossible with the ZS80’s fixed optic. Alternatively, an F2.8 zoom lens unlocks bright telephoto reach for wildlife and sports shooters.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability Matters
Photographers shooting outdoors or in demanding conditions rightly prioritize ruggedness.
The G95 boasts splash and dust resistance, a significant upgrade for professionals shooting landscapes or wildlife in variable weather. Its weather sealing is a big confidence boost when facing light rain or dusty trails.
The ZS80, by contrast, lacks any environmental sealing - common in compacts - making it best suited to benign weather conditions or casual shooting scenarios. Droping or harsh environments pose riskier scenarios for long-term durability.
Video Capabilities: Who’s the Better Videographer?
Both Panasonic cameras offer 4K recording, but their video features diverge significantly.
The ZS80 shoots UHD 4K at 30p with MPEG-4/H.264 codecs but lacks a microphone or headphone jack, limiting audio controls. Its 5-axis optical image stabilization improves handheld footage smoothness.
The G95 supports 4K up to 30p at higher bitrates (100 Mbps), equipped with external microphone and headphone ports - vital for vloggers and filmmakers prioritizing audio quality and monitoring. It also features sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization, outperforming lens stabilization in many scenarios.
Additionally, the G95 offers advanced video modes including V-Log L profiles (with firmware update), allowing color grading freedom rare in this class. Built-in intervalometers and slow/fast motion options make it a versatile B-camera or content creation tool.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Usage Considerations
Endurance matters when shooting on location or during extended sessions.
The ZS80 offers approximately 380 shots per battery charge (CIPA rating), outperforming the G95’s 290 shots. The G95’s more power-hungry EVF, articulating screen, and heavier processor take their toll.
Both cameras accept SD cards, but the G95 supports faster UHS-II cards, advantageous for high-bitrate video recording and rapid continuous shooting bursts.
Price-to-Performance Ratio: What Are You Getting for Your Money?
At launch and currently, the ZS80 favors the budget-conscious traveler or casual shooter at around $450, while the G95 targets the enthusiast/professional segment with a $1000 price tag body-only.
Evaluating value, the ZS80 impresses given its all-in-one portability and extreme zoom reach. However, its small sensor and limited low-light abilities mean image quality will lag behind mirrorless alternatives.
The G95, though pricier, offers superior image quality, build, autofocus, and video versatility - making it a compelling investment for those seeking longevity and creative freedom. The extensive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem further sweetens the deal.
What About Image Quality in Practice? Sample Shots Breakdown
Nothing beats seeing actual photos side by side to grasp differences.
Portraits on the G95 show creamy bokeh backgrounds with natural skin tones, attributable to lens and sensor combo. The ZS80’s portraits, while decent, reveal flatter bokeh due to smaller sensor and slower aperture.
Landscapes from the G95 boast higher detail, richer dynamic range, and cleaner shadows. The ZS80’s shots sometimes lack punch and show noise creeping in shadow areas.
Wildlife images favor G95’s faster and more accurate AF, with sharper captures at long focal lengths. Sports sequences attest to smoother tracking on the mirrorless, enabling more keepers per session.
Street photography benefits from the G95’s versatility but ZS80’s discreet profile and quick zoom access prove fun for spur-of-the-moment shots.
Tailoring Recommendations to Your Photography Style
-
For Travelers and Casual Shooters: The Panasonic ZS80 excels if you want the lightest carry, a ready-to-use superzoom lens, and simple operation without switching glass or fussing with settings.
-
For Enthusiasts and Pros: The G95’s superior image quality, lens versatility, robust autofocus, and strong video features make it a more future-proof choice for portrait, landscape, sports, wildlife, macro, and video-centric users.
-
Street and Night Photographers: The G95’s better low light sensitivity, electronic viewfinder, and articulating screen give it the edge in diverse shooting situations including events and urban nightscapes.
-
Macro: Only the G95 offers professional lens choices and focusing precision for close-up work.
Diving Deeper: Discipline-Specific Performance Scores
Looking at genre-based evaluations synthesizing lab and field testing confirms these findings: G95 outperforms the ZS80 across the board except in pure convenience and size.
The Final Word: Which Panasonic Should You Choose?
The ZS80 is a nimble, affordable superzoom suitable for photographers who value portability and zoom reach above all. Its user-friendly interface and 4K capture make for a competent everyday snapshot tool, travel companion, or an upgrade from smartphones.
The G95 is a capable and flexible workhorse that punches above its price class with a larger sensor, weather sealing, and robust manual controls. Its extensive lens ecosystem and video prowess offer creative freedom for advanced amateurs and professionals alike.
Ultimately, your decision hinges on the balance of image quality, system expandability, and shooting preferences against portability and budget. Both cameras shine in their own contexts, but for photographers craving growth and image fidelity, the G95 commands clear superiority.
Choosing the right camera is always a blend of art and science - weighing specs, real-world usage, and personal style. Hopefully, this detailed comparison helps you make that vital, informed choice with confidence.
Safe shooting!
Panasonic ZS80 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DC-TZ95 | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-02-18 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20.3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 327 grams (0.72 pounds) | 536 grams (1.18 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 290 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $448 | $998 |