Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6000
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus 6000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was unveiled 8 years later than the 6000 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 III scores vs the 6000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus 6000
E-M10 III | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | July 2009 | More recent by 100 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-M10 III
6000 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 6000
E-M10 III | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has proportions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus 6000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 III and the 6000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and 6000 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and 6000.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $650 | $259 |