Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102
Portability
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
Portability
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
Panasonic ZS80
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Launched February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ95
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS70
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's look closer at the Panasonic ZS80 versus Samsung SL102, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Panasonic and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the ZS80 (20MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ZS80 was introduced 9 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the ZS80 grades against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic ZS80 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS80 over the Samsung SL102
| ZS80 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 111 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Panasonic ZS80
| SL102 | ZS80 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS80 and Samsung SL102
| ZS80 | SL102 |
|---|
Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic ZS80 provides external measurements of 112mm x 69mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") having a weight of 327 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic ZS80 versus Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the ZS80 versus the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS80 and SL102 is 86 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The picture underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS80 and SL102.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Panasonic ZS80 to offer you greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern ZS80 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS80
Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
has manual focus
decent MP (20MP)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
features face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Panasonic ZS80 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lighter than others in class (116 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS80
Sports photography with Samsung SL102
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS80
Travel photography with Samsung SL102
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
has bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
decent MP (20MP)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (720mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
lighter than others in class (116g)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Panasonic ZS80 Landscape photography features
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography features
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (380 per charge)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS80 Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL102 Vlogging highlights
rather wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not have microphone support
good max aperture (f)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than others in class (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Panasonic ZS80 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | Lumix DC-TZ95 | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2018-02-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 327g (0.72 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $448 | $130 |