Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-3D1/Panasonic-3D1-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-30W/Ricoh-WG-30W-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Released November 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Panasonic 3D1 versus Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the 3D1 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The 3D1 was released 3 years before the WG-30W which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the 3D1 scores vs the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 and Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic 3D1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Ricoh WG-30W
3D1 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Panasonic 3D1
WG-30W | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | ![]() | November 2011 | Newer by 35 months |
Common features in the Panasonic 3D1 and Ricoh WG-30W
3D1 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Panasonic 3D1 enjoys physical dimensions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic 3D1 versus Ricoh WG-30W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the 3D1 and the WG-30W.
![Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-3D1-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 3D1 and WG-30W is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-3D1-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 3D1 and WG-30W.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30W to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged 3D1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-3D1-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-3D1-vs-Ricoh-WG-30W-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic 3D1 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-11-07 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1300s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | 300 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $670 | $280 |