Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H
93 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced November 2011
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Panasonic 3D1 versus Sigma Quattro H, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Panasonic and Sigma. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the 3D1 (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the 3D1 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) possess different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 3D1 was launched 5 years prior to the Quattro H which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the 3D1 grades versus the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic 3D1 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Sigma Quattro H
| 3D1 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Panasonic 3D1
| Quattro H | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | November 2011 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Sharper display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic 3D1 and Sigma Quattro H
| 3D1 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Panasonic 3D1 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic 3D1 versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the 3D1 and the Quattro H.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 3D1 and Quattro H is 93 and 78 respectively.
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 3D1 and Quattro H.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 3D1 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro H will show extra detail utilizing its extra 33 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged 3D1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Sigma |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-11-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 45MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1300 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $670 | $1,134 |