Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Released November 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Panasonic and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 3D1 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is very similar but the 3D1 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 3D1 was released 3 years later than the A200 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the 3D1 grades vs the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic 3D1 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Sony A200
3D1 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2011 | July 2008 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Panasonic 3D1
A200 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Panasonic 3D1 and Sony A200
3D1 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic 3D1 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the 3D1 compared to the A200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 3D1 and A200 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 3D1 and A200.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The 3D1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Panasonic 3D1 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent 3D1 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic 3D1 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2011-11-07 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 23 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1300s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $670 | $100 |