Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 vs. DMC-TS5: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right compact digital camera can be a surprisingly complex process, especially when you’re looking at cameras with distinctly different design goals and shooting capabilities from the same manufacturer. Today, I'll take a deep dive into two intriguing Panasonic Lumix models from the early 2010s: the Lumix DMC-F5 (a straightforward small sensor compact) and the more rugged Lumix DMC-TS5 (also known as the Lumix DMC-FT5) waterproof model. Both share Panasonic’s compact DNA but take radically different paths in features, build, and target users.

After testing and evaluating each from top to bottom - including sensor performance, autofocus systems, image quality, ease of use, and durability - I’m excited to share my detailed insights. Whether you want a basic, budget-friendly compact or a tough, travel-ready shooter with better specs, this comparison should help clarify which one fits your unique needs.

For context: I’ve tested thousands of cameras across genres - from casual travel companions to professional workhorses - and this hands-on experience shapes every assessment here.

Getting to Know the Cameras: What Are We Comparing?

Before going into nuances, let’s set the stage with a quick specs overview to frame the conversation.

These raw numbers tell only part of the story, so let me unpack what they mean in practice - starting with how these cameras feel and function in the real world.

Design and Ergonomics: Size, Control, and Handling

How a camera feels in your hands makes a huge impact on the shooting experience, especially for spontaneous or travel photography. So, the first thing I did was compare physical dimensions, weight, and control layout.

The Panasonic F5 is remarkably small and lightweight at just 97×58×22mm and 121 grams. It’s the kind of pocketable compact designed for casual snaps where bulk is a liability. Unfortunately, its minimalist styling limits direct control - without any manual dials or buttons for aperture or shutter priority, you’re entirely in Auto or program modes.

By contrast, the TS5 is bulkier (110×67×29mm) and heavier (214 grams), reflecting its ruggedized build and environmental sealing. It does sacrifice some pocketability for durability and robustness. The TS5’s controls are more versatile, with manual exposure modes and customizable options accessible through a logical layout.

Analyzing the top views side-by-side:

The TS5 offers better ergonomics for longer shooting sessions. Despite lacking an electronic viewfinder, its 3-inch, high-resolution LCD (more on that in a moment) facilitates composing shots even under tricky lighting conditions. The F5’s smaller 2.7” screen at 230k dots is considerably dimmer and lower resolution, which impacts usability outdoors.

In essence, if a compact, pocket-friendly size is paramount, the F5 wins hands down. But if you want more control and durability out of your compact, the TS5’s thoughtful layout and weather sealing justify its extra size and weight.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: CCD vs CMOS Debate

Both cameras rely on a 1/2.3-inch sensor, popular in compact cameras, but they differ fundamentally in sensor type and resolution - factors that directly influence image quality.

The F5’s CCD sensor sports 14 megapixels. CCDs historically provide decent color rendition and less noise at base ISO but tend to struggle with higher ISO performance and readout speed.

The TS5 gets a newer 16-megapixel CMOS sensor, which generally offers faster readouts, better low-light performance, and supports better video capabilities - expected for a rugged travel camera.

Testing both in practical conditions confirmed these expectations. The TS5’s CMOS sensor showed noticeably improved high ISO performance with cleaner detail retention at ISO 800 and above. The F5 quickly accumulated noise beyond ISO 400, necessitating lower ISO shooting in most cases. Additionally, the TS5 benefits from optical image stabilization - a crucial advantage to offset camera shake at telephoto focal lengths or slower shutter speeds. The F5 lacks any stabilization, meaning handheld shots risk blur unless very bright lighting permits faster shutter speeds.

Image sharpness in standard daylight was quite comparable - both delivered respectable detail for their sensor class, though the TS5’s higher resolution gives a slight edge for cropping or large prints. Color reproduction leaned toward punchier, more vibrant results on the TS5, likely influenced by sensor and image processor improvements.

In resolution terms, the cameras maxed out at:

• F5: 4320 × 3240 pixels
• TS5: 4608 × 3456 pixels

This subtle but meaningful increase supports larger prints or better cropping flexibility.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast and Accurate?

In real-world shooting - especially for wildlife, sports, or street photography - the autofocus system and shooting speed make or break a camera’s usability.

The F5 provides Contrast Detection autofocus only, with rudimentary center-weighted focusing and basic tracking. The single continuous shooting rate of 1 fps means burst shooting is effectively unavailable.

The TS5 ramps this up significantly with 23 AF points employing contrast detection, continuous focus tracking, and a rapid burst mode shooting up to 10 frames per second. This responsiveness opens up photographic opportunities the F5 simply can’t touch.

While neither camera supports face or animal eye detection, TS5’s multi-area AF coverage and faster sensor readouts make autofocus more reliable under moving or uncertain subjects in daylight. Low contrast and low light autofocus were challenging for both, but the TS5’s optical image stabilization helped deliver sharper shots by allowing longer exposures without camera shake.

For action or wildlife photographers on a budget, the TS5’s burst capabilities and AF tracking are highly attractive - even if neither camera qualifies as a pro sports tool.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: How Tough Is Tough?

If you’re the outdoorsy type or just prone to shooting in inclement conditions, build quality matters enormously.

The F5 is a barebones compact with a plastic body lacking any weather sealing. It’s light and easy to carry, but fragile and vulnerable to dust, splashes, and knocks.

By contrast, the TS5 is a well-engineered waterproof compact, sealed against dust, shock, and freezing temperatures, with operational waterproofing down to several meters underwater. This ruggedness expands where and how you can shoot - from scuba diving adventures to winter treks - in confidence.

Environmental sealing comes at the cost of some bulk and weight, but the TS5 strikes a solid balance, proving remarkably resilient during my outdoor testing.

LCD and User Interface: Composing and Reviewing Shots

Viewing your shots is as important as capturing them, and that depends on the LCD screen quality and interface design.

The F5 is fitted with a small 2.7” TFT screen with 230k-dot resolution. In bright sunlight, the screen quickly washes out, making accurate composition challenging unless you shield the display. No touchscreen capability further limits navigation speed.

The TS5 upgrades to a 3” TFT screen at 460k dots, delivering much sharper detail, better color reproduction, and greater brightness. While still not a touchscreen, the sharper display improves image review and menu navigation.

Despite the absence of an electronic viewfinder (typical for compacts in this price bracket), TS5’s screen works well in most shooting conditions.

Lens Performance and Macro Capability

Both cameras feature fixed lenses with relatively similar zoom ranges:

• F5: 28–140mm equivalent (5× optical zoom), F3.2–6.5 aperture
• TS5: 28–128mm equivalent (4.6× optical zoom), F3.3–5.9 aperture

The F5 offers slightly longer reach on the telephoto end but at the expense of slower maximum aperture at the long end, impacting low-light performance. Image quality from these lenses is typical for compact zooms - decent sharpness in the center, some softness at edges and wide-open apertures.

Macro focus capability is identical on both - around 5 cm minimum focusing distance, suitable for close-ups of flowers, insects, and small objects but lacking the magnification of dedicated macro lenses.

Video Capabilities: More Than Just Stills

A growing number of photographers also demand strong video features in their cameras, so I tested both for video quality and flexibility.

The F5 maxes out at 720p HD video (1280×720) at 30 fps, using Motion JPEG format - an older, less efficient codec that results in larger files and lower quality compared to newer standards.

The TS5 supports Full HD 1080p video at 60 fps, in modern MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats - offering smoother motion and higher quality. Built-in optical image stabilization is a clear advantage for handheld video.

Neither camera supports 4K photo modes or external microphone inputs, limiting use for serious videographers, but the TS5’s capabilities put it clearly ahead for casual video shooting.

Connectivity and Storage: Modern Convenience

Among compacts, wireless connectivity is increasingly expected - but only the TS5 offers any form of built-in wireless features.

The F5 provides none - you’re stuck with a USB 2.0 connection for file transfer.

The TS5 includes built-in Wi-Fi for easy image transfer and remote control via compatible apps, plus NFC for one-touch pairing with smartphones. It also sports HDMI output for direct TV playback. This connectivity suite is surprisingly advanced for a rugged compact from this era.

Both cameras use SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards with a single slot - not surprising given their size class.

Battery Life and Practical Usage Considerations

Battery endurance can be make-or-break depending on your shooting style.

The F5 offers roughly 250 shots per charge, reflecting its modest size and efficiency.

The TS5’s larger battery and energy-efficient CMOS sensor boost this to about 370 shots, better for outings without frequent charging options.

Both use proprietary rechargeable battery packs, with no support for USB charging - something to keep in mind if you prioritize on-the-go power management.

Real-World Use Across Photography Genres

Let’s apply this technical breakdown to practical use cases important to different photographers.

Portrait Photography

While neither camera supports advanced face or eye detection autofocus, relatively decent autofocus tracking on the TS5 improves chances of nailing sharp portraits. The TS5’s subtly better color rendition and optical stabilization offer nicer skin tones and reduced camera shake.

The F5’s lack of IS and slower AF make portraits trickier, especially in lower light. Both cameras’ fixed lenses aren’t ideal for very shallow depth-of-field bokeh effects due to small sensors and narrow apertures, but wide 28mm equiv. focal length can capture environmental portraits well on the TS5.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range and resolution matter for landscapes. The TS5’s CMOS sensor with 16 MP margin provides wider tone capture - helpful in bright scenes with shadows and highlights.

Neither camera has advanced weather sealing besides the TS5, but its ruggedness supports adventurous shooting. The F5 is too fragile outdoors and low in resolution for serious landscape work.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Neither camera is a pro-level shooter here - but the TS5’s 10 fps burst, faster AF, and improved stabilization make it better suited to catching fleeting wildlife or action in casual settings. The F5’s 1 fps burst precludes any meaningful series shooting.

Street Photography

Here, pocketability and discretion count. The F5’s smaller size and weight make it less obtrusive, helpful for candid shots. However, the TS5 isn’t overly bulky and benefits from faster operation and better low-light autofocus.

Macro Photography

Both cameras share similar close-focusing distance and capabilities. Image stabilization on the TS5 gives an edge in avoiding blur in delicate macro shots.

Night and Astro Photography

Both cameras are limited by their small sensors and relatively high base noise levels. TS5’s better ISO handling and stabilization make it marginally better for low-light handheld shots, but long exposure astro photography is out of reach without manual bulb modes and RAW file support - which neither provides.

Video Recording

TS5’s Full HD 1080p at 60 fps and built-in IS make it the clear winner for casual video users. The F5’s capped 720p at 30 fps and limited codec reduce versatility.

Travel Photography

Durability, size, battery, and connectivity all weigh heavily. The TS5’s weather sealing, Wi-Fi, GPS, and longer battery life make it an excellent travel companion despite larger size. The F5’s ultra-compact form factor is great for casual city snaps but lacks versatility.

Professional Work

Neither camera satisfies professional standards - no RAW support, limited controls, and restricted image quality. TS5’s manual exposure mode and better video give it a slight edge for light enthusiast use.

Panasonic F5 front Panasonic F5 screen back Panasonic TS5 front Panasonic TS5 screen back

Here are some real-world engagement shots I took with each - notice the TS5’s better detail and cleaner high ISO, as well as more consistent colors.

Summary of Performance Ratings and Value

Judging the two models holistically:

And by genre-specific performance:

Strengths and Weaknesses At a Glance

Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5

Pros:

• Ultra-compact and lightweight
• Affordable price point (~$100 launch)
• Suitable for casual snapshots and travel as a backup
• Basic user-friendly functionality

Cons:

• No image stabilization
• Slow autofocus and 1 fps burst rate
• Low-resolution, low-brightness LCD
• No manual exposure modes or RAW support
• No wireless connectivity or video above 720p

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5

Pros:

• Rugged, waterproof, dustproof, and shockproof design
• 16 MP CMOS sensor with better low light performance
• Optical image stabilization enhances sharpness handheld
• 10 fps burst mode and reliable autofocus
• Full HD 1080p video at 60 fps with stabilization
• Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, GPS, and HDMI output
• Manual exposure control and exposure compensation
• Reasonable battery life (370 shots)

Cons:

• Larger size and weight reduce pocketability
• Limited lens aperture restricts depth-of-field effects
• No external microphone input or RAW file capture

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Based on thorough hands-on testing, here are my targeted recommendations.

Choose The Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 if:

• You want a very compact camera for casual everyday use or basic travel photography
• Your budget is tight and you need a no-frills budget compact
• You don’t require advanced features, manual control, or video beyond 720p
• Pocketability and ease of use are your absolute priorities

Choose The Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5 if:

• You need a tough, durable camera for outdoor adventures, water sports, or harsh environments
• You want better image quality, especially in low light
• Video recording in Full HD is important to you
• Manual exposure controls and exposure compensation are valuable to your workflow
• Connectivity features like Wi-Fi and GPS improve your travel photography workflow
• You plan shooting fast-moving subjects - burst mode and AF performance benefit you

Final Thoughts: Experience Meets Expertise

Having spent extensive time shooting side-by-side, I can affirm that these two Panasonic Lumix models serve dramatically different niches despite their similar compact form factors.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 is a highly basic, entry-level compact aimed squarely at casual shooters who value simplicity and size over features. It shines in its portability but shows its age in sensor technology, user interface, and video capability.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5, meanwhile, represents a more contemporary take on the compact camera - embracing ruggedness, enhanced image quality, and richer feature sets that appeal to travel photographers and outdoor enthusiasts willing to trade bulk for durability and versatility.

If you’re an enthusiast or professional looking for a dedicated compact, the TS5 is by far the stronger proposition. Meanwhile, the F5 may still find a niche for those who want an ultra-budget, pocketable “throwaway” point-and-shoot.

In the grand scheme of 2020s photography gear, these cameras stand as excellent case studies in design tradeoffs. Hopefully, this comparison illuminates how clear prioritization - whether of compactness or rugged performance - guides which camera you ultimately select.

Happy shooting!