Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Panasonic FH1 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Panasonic and Pentax. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the FH1 (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FH1 was launched 4 years before the WG-3 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the FH1 grades against the WG-3 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FH1 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| FH1 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Panasonic FH1
| WG-3 GPS | FH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH1 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| FH1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Panasonic FH1 offers outside measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic FH1 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the FH1 vs the WG-3 GPS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the FH1 and WG-3 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the FH1 and WG-3 GPS.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged FH1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic FH1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Pentax |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Alternate name | Lumix DMC-FS10 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lb) | 238 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $150 | $350 |