Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d3b/58d3bced54bef37acbf33e0cc1a92af65eb0c1e4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS16
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Panasonic FH2 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the FH2 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the FH2 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The FH2 was revealed 18 months after the GR Digital III making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the FH2 grades versus the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FH2 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
FH2 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic FH2
GR Digital III | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH2 and Ricoh GR Digital III
FH2 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH2 enjoys outer measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FH2 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FH2 versus the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/355b3/355b3978a5a769a3e206a87cf81e3019369c6f12" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FH2 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab851/ab851f09f6e8ea0a6e45deb21695c2e55097f948" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FH2 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FH2 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic FH2 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger FH2 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4961/a4961b8f9ed4307f87ffa3ca3c5c06ad4b9c20cf" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c62e/8c62ec62203376c7d3bc497a578d69d163746abb" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Also called | Lumix DMC-FS16 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine IV | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $149 | $399 |