Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS16
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Panasonic FH2 versus Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FH2 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FH2 was brought out 4 years before the WG-4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the FH2 grades vs the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH2 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Ricoh WG-4
FH2 | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Panasonic FH2
WG-4 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 37 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH2 and Ricoh WG-4
FH2 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH2 features outer measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Panasonic FH2 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the FH2 against the WG-4.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FH2 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The pic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FH2 and WG-4.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to result in extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged FH2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FH2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS16 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $149 | $330 |