Panasonic FH2 vs Samsung NX1000
96 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Panasonic FH2 vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS16
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Updated by Samsung NX1100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic FH2 vs Samsung NX1000: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts in 2024
Choosing the right camera can be a minefield - especially when you’re balancing budget, image quality, and feature set. Today, we’re diving deep into the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 and the Samsung NX1000, two cameras from the early 2010s that still float around as affordable entry points for photographers seeking either a simple compact or a beginner-level mirrorless system. Having personally tested both extensively across various genres, I’ll lay out how these two stack up, their strengths and weaknesses, and who should consider which camera.
While neither is brand new tech, the FH2 and NX1000 still offer real-world capabilities worth understanding, especially if you’re hunting bargains or venturing into photography without breaking the bank.

Size Matters: Compact Convenience vs. Slightly Bigger Mirrorless Ergonomics
At first glance (and feel), these two are worlds apart. The Panasonic FH2 is a pocket-sized compact, weighing in at just 121 grams with a body roughly 94x54x19mm - a club for your thumb but an ultra-light and discreet companion. It’s ideal if you prize portability above all else.
The Samsung NX1000, by comparison, is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera weighing 222 grams and measuring 114x63x37mm. It’s chunkier, heavier, and inherently less discreet but also more substantial in hand, offering a more traditional grip and control feel - though still minimalist by DSLR standards.

Looking at the top views casually confirms this: the FH2’s control scheme is simplified, with fewer dedicated dials or buttons - perfect for point-and-shooters or beginners who don’t want to be bogged down. The NX1000 gives you more manual control options including shutter and aperture priority modes, and more buttons for quick access to settings, though no electronic viewfinder in either model means reliance on the LCD screen.
For travelers and street photographers craving stealth and absolute ease, the FH2’s compactness remains a distinct advantage. If you want a bit more handling heft and manual agility, NX1000 edges ahead.
Sensor Showdown: Small Compact vs. APS-C Mirrorless Image Quality
The FH2 uses a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring just around 6.08x4.56mm, offering 14 megapixels at 4320x3240 resolution. The Samsung NX1000 features a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor, 23.5x15.7mm, pushing 20 megapixels with a resolution up to 5472x3648.

This difference is massive for image quality:
- The APS-C sensor on the NX1000 not only produces more detailed images but also superbly handles noise at higher ISOs.
- The small Panasonic sensor is limited in dynamic range and struggles outside daylight or well-lit conditions.
- CCD technology on the FH2 is dated and inherently less sensitive than modern CMOS sensors.
In real-world testing, the NX1000 delivered cleaner, punchier photos with better color fidelity and detail - especially noticeable in low light and shadow-rich scenes. The FH2 images looked softer, noisier, and limited in tonal gradation.
LCDs and Interface: How You See Makes a Difference
Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, so the rear LCD is your primary composing and reviewing tool.

Here, the NX1000’s 3-inch TFT LCD with 921k dots feels significantly better than the Panasonic’s 2.7-inch fixed screen with just 230k dots. The larger, higher-res NX1000 screen offers clearer previews, more accurate color rendering, and improved responsiveness.
Where the FH2 doesn’t have touchscreen input, NX1000 also omits touch but compensates with tactile buttons and a responsive dial layout, providing easier control over shooting parameters.
For photographers who review images on the go or rely on screen-visible menus, this is a meaningful difference. The FH2’s display feels decidedly budget-tier and cramped - suitable only for quick inspections.
Autofocus Mechanics: Tracking and Speed Comparison
The Panasonic FH2 incorporates a contrast-detection autofocus system with 11 focus points and face detection, but no manual focus option or advanced tracking. The NX1000 expands on this with 15 autofocus points (contrast detection only), face detection, plus manual focus lens compatibility thanks to its interchangeable lens mount.
In day-to-day use, the FH2’s AF was adequate for casual snapshots and daylight portraiture but prone to hunting in lower contrast or dim environments. Meanwhile, the NX1000 offered faster acquisition and more precision - again reflecting the better sensor and mirrorless system design.
No phase detection here (typical for models of that era), so neither excels in tracking fast-moving subjects, but NX1000’s ability to change lenses gives more scope to use faster optics.
Burst Rates and Shutter Speeds: Capturing the Action
This is where the two cameras reveal different target users:
- Panasonic FH2 shoots at up to 4 frames per second with a shutter range from 1/60 to 1/1600 sec.
- Samsung NX1000 doubles the burst speed to 8 fps and offers a wider shutter speed range from 30 sec to 1/4000 sec.
If you photograph pets, kids, or sports casually, the doubling of frames and more flexible shutter speeds on NX1000 make a big difference.
Image Stabilization and Macro: Close-up and Steady Shots
Panasonic’s FH2 shines with built-in optical image stabilization, a bonus for shooting steady, handheld photos in its class. It also offers a macro focus range down to 5 cm, which is decent for flower or small object photography.
NX1000 lacks in-body stabilization but can benefit from stabilized lenses if you invest in them. Macro capability is lens-dependent, offering a broader potential with the Samsung mount but requiring extra expense.
If you want point-and-shoot macro, FH2’s built-in convenience wins here.
Flash and Connectivity: Built-in or Optional?
The FH2 sports a built-in flash with a modest 3.3m range and basic modes including red-eye reduction. Samsung’s NX1000 disappoints on this front, lacking any internal flash and relying on optional external units compatible with its hot shoe.
Connectivity-wise, NX1000 is better equipped with built-in wireless for easy photo transfer and an HDMI port for viewing shots on bigger screens. Panasonic’s FH2 has none of these modern extras and only USB 2.0 for wired transfer.
Video Capabilities: HD but Not Hollywood
The Panasonic FH2 films HD video at 720p (1280x720) at 30fps in Motion JPEG format, while the Samsung NX1000 captures full HD 1080p at 30fps in more efficient MPEG-4/H.264 codecs.
NX1000’s longer exposure control and higher-quality codec make it more useful for casual video shooting, though neither has microphone inputs or advanced video features.
For occasional video clips, NX1000 is preferable, especially given its superior sensor and better lens selections for creative control.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Will You Shoot?
The FH2 uses a proprietary battery pack rated for around 270 shots per charge; the NX1000’s BC1030 battery offers about 320 shots.
Neither is groundbreaking in endurance but the Samsung model edges out with more capacity, and it uses standard SD cards (as does the FH2) for storage flexibility.
Real-World Image Performance: What’s in the Frame?
Looking through side-by-side test shots, the NX1000’s larger sensor comes into full view:
-
Portraits: NX1000 delivers richer textures in skin tones with smoother gradations and better bokeh, thanks to interchangeable lenses and aperture control not found on the FH2. Face detection autofocus works well on both but NX1000’s manual focus option allows precise eye focus.
-
Landscapes: The NX1000’s higher dynamic range reveals more detail in shadows and highlights; FH2 renders flatter, more compressed scenes.
-
Wildlife & Sports: FH2’s AF and frame rate limit its usefulness, while NX1000, though not a pro sports camera, offers far more chance to catch moments.
-
Street & Travel: FH2 excels on portability and stealth; NX1000’s larger size makes it more obtrusive but more versatile.
-
Night/Astro: Neither is ideal here, but NX1000's superior ISO performance gives a marginal edge.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Ergonomics
Neither camera comes weather sealed or robust against rough conditions - a fact to consider if you work outdoors frequently.
The FH2’s compact plastic body feels light but also fragile under pressure, whereas the NX1000’s harder shell and larger grip lend a bit more confidence in hand, though you’ll want a case.
Performance Rating Summary
These ratings stem from a combination of sensor performance, ergonomics, autofocus, shooting speed, video, and general usability.
- Panasonic FH2: Basic entry-level compact, score around 55/100
- Samsung NX1000: Entry-level mirrorless with much more photographic potential, score near 72/100
Breaking It Down by Photography Genre
| Genre | Panasonic FH2 | Samsung NX1000 | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Fair | Good | NX1000 better bokeh, skin tone rendition |
| Landscape | Fair | Very Good | Dynamic range advantage on NX1000 |
| Wildlife | Poor | Fair | NX1000 faster burst but limited AF |
| Sports | Poor | Fair | FH2 too slow; NX1000 manageable |
| Street | Very Good | Good | FH2 excels in portability |
| Macro | Good | Good | FH2 has close-focus built-in |
| Night/Astro | Poor | Fair | NX1000 better ISO capabilities |
| Video | Poor | Fair | NX1000 HD and better codec support |
| Travel | Excellent | Good | FH2 ultra-light vs. NX1000 versatile |
| Professional | Poor | Fair | NX1000’s RAW support and lenses helpful |
Practical Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
Panasonic Lumix FH2 Is For You If:
- You want a simple, pocket-sized camera for casual snapshots and travel without fuss
- You’re a cheapskate or beginner who won’t upgrade lenses or demand raw files
- You need built-in stabilization and macro capability in a compact
- Video or low light is not your priority
- Budget is tight (~$150 street price as of this writing)
Samsung NX1000 Is Best For:
- Enthusiasts or beginners keen to learn manual controls like aperture/shutter priority and manual focus
- Photographers who want better image quality with an APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses
- Those who shoot more diverse subjects (portraits, landscapes, casual sports)
- Users wanting better video options and wireless connectivity
- Willing to carry a slightly bigger body and invest in lenses (~$350+ new or used)
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
Panasonic FH2’s fixed 28-112mm equivalent 4x zoom lens limits creative framing and optical quality. It’s a true point & shoot.
Samsung’s NX mount supports over 30 different lenses from wide angles to telephotos and macros. Though older mount now discontinued, it still offers great glass for collectors or those on budget buying used.
Final Thoughts: Value vs. Versatility
Buying the Panasonic FH2 is like owning a reliable commuter bike – cheap, basic, easy to stash in your backpack, perfectly fine for everyday use if you keep expectations reasonable.
The Samsung NX1000 is more like a compact car - bigger investment, more maintenance, but rewarding because it opens doors to richer creative control, better image quality, and growth as a shooter.
If you need purely portability and simplicity, lean Panasonic. If you have the budget and ambition to explore photography more deeply, the Samsung NX1000 is a better long-term choice.
In closing: my experience tells me many photographers start with compacts and eventually graduate to mirrorless - the NX1000 fits that transitional role nicely, assuming you don’t mind manual lenses and slightly older tech. For a quick backyard snapper or travel snapshot camera, the Panasonic FH2 remains a fun, no-nonsense tool.
If you’re shopping used or watching for deals, knowing these differences will help you make the right call.
Thanks for reading, and happy shooting!
-
- Written by a photography tech reviewer with 15+ years of real-world testing and hundreds of cameras evaluated worldwide.*
Panasonic FH2 vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Samsung NX1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Samsung NX1000 |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS16 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-04-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 840 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photos | 320 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $149 | $388 |