Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Samsung. The resolution of the PL200 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe PL200 was introduced 4 years before the WB2200F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the PL200 grades vs the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung PL200 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Samsung PL200 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Samsung WB2200F
| PL200 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Samsung PL200
| WB2200F | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Samsung WB2200F
| PL200 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung PL200 enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the PL200 compared to the WB2200F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the PL200 and WB2200F is 94 and 59 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the PL200 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB2200F to result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged PL200 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Samsung PL200 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung PL200 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 170g (0.37 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $599 |