Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS16
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the FH2 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FH2 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FH2 was introduced 4 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FH2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the FH2 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FH2 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
FH2 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Panasonic FH2
DP2 Quattro | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH2 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
FH2 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FH2 comes with outer measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the FH2 and the DP2 Quattro.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FH2 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FH2 and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FH2 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older FH2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FH2 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sigma |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS16 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine IV | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $149 | $931 |