Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f214/4f2145e13d5e8faa7940ed0459e5247133b2a64c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Panasonic FH20 versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the FH20 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The FH20 was introduced 8 years before the WG-50 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the FH20 scores versus the WG-50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH20 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Ricoh WG-50
FH20 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Panasonic FH20
WG-50 | FH20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 89 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Panasonic FH20 and Ricoh WG-50
FH20 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH20 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FH20 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the FH20 versus the WG-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cffd7/cffd798a75864422c69b8ec081871070febc11e7" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FH20 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/275e7/275e72399b176bd14f0e85e079870a1bb9bea356" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FH20 and WG-50.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older FH20 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03294/03294d1fbed73171c894e1a93dd7a7ffacd5cd6e" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16870/16870b157cab6f89f124ccfeed5d466b7437f5d1" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS30 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 178 grams (0.39 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $179 | $280 |