Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS30
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FH20 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FH20 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the FH20 grades versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH20 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| FH20 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Panasonic FH20
| WG-M1 | FH20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH20 and Ricoh WG-M1
| FH20 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH20 offers external measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the FH20 against the WG-M1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH20 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FH20 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of photographs although you will want to take the age of the products into consideration. The older FH20 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Other name | Lumix DMC-FS30 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 178 grams (0.39 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $179 | $2,000 |
