Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200
93 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS30
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Panasonic and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the FH20 (14MP) and A200 (10MP) and the FH20 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FH20 was introduced 18 months later than the A200 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FH20 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the FH20 matches up versus the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FH20 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Sony A200
| FH20 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | July 2008 | More recent by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Panasonic FH20
| A200 | FH20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Panasonic FH20 and Sony A200
| FH20 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic FH20 enjoys outer dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the FH20 versus the A200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FH20 and A200 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FH20 and A200.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FH20 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic FH20 will offer you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The newer FH20 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Panasonic FH20 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FS30 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 178 gr (0.39 lb) | 572 gr (1.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $179 | $100 |