Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48
94 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
95 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX40
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Panasonic FH22 and Panasonic FX48, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and they are both designed by Panasonic. The resolution of the FH22 (14MP) and the FX48 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FH22 was introduced 12 months later than the FX48 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the FH22 grades versus the FX48 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FH22 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Panasonic FX48
| FH22 | FX48 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Panasonic FH22
| FX48 | FH22 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic FH22 and Panasonic FX48
| FH22 | FX48 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FH22 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has proportions of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FH22 and Panasonic FX48 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the FH22 vs the FX48.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the FH22 and FX48 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH22 and FX48.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Panasonic FH22 to give greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger FH22 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS33 | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 170 gr (0.37 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $200 | $325 |
