Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a056/9a0560529b2d7cdf5610656aaa640a5f52dfa356" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front"
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Panasonic GF1
- Newer Model is Panasonic GF3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Panasonic. The resolution of the FH22 (14MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is relatively similar but the FH22 (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The FH22 was unveiled 13 months earlier than the GF2 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the FH22 grades vs the GF2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH22 Gallery & Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Panasonic GF2
FH22 | GF2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Panasonic FH22
GF2 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH22 and Panasonic GF2
FH22 | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Panasonic FH22 comes with exterior measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Panasonic GF2 has specifications of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the FH22 and the GF2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6769/b6769d514ce07b7c09725ee67ab7f22c07d8ead8" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FH22 and GF2 is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd656/dd6568db96a754eb645a3019d91b47e26e439377" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FH22 and GF2.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The FH22 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic FH22 will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older FH22 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03e17/03e172e04cc4a340618992a7c47e4038b9dd14d3" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2cf1/f2cf16a3ca2e8ba28ab86f2dfae4468048208059" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Panasonic FH22 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FS33 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2011-02-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 170 gr (0.37 lb) | 310 gr (0.68 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $330 |