Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d9c5/5d9c596e29e0a8e6ee230208f428277550917c6f" alt="Samsung NX1 front Samsung NX1 front"
66 Imaging
67 Features
90 Overall
76
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Revealed September 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Panasonic FH22 versus Samsung NX1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the FH22 (14MP) and NX1 (28MP) and the FH22 (1/2.3") and NX1 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The FH22 was introduced 5 years earlier than the NX1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the FH22 matches up versus the NX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 and Samsung NX1. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FH22 Gallery and Samsung NX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Samsung NX1
FH22 | NX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1 over the Panasonic FH22
NX1 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+806k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung NX1
FH22 | NX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Panasonic FH22 comes with physical dimensions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung NX1 has specifications of 139mm x 102mm x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Panasonic FH22 versus Samsung NX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the FH22 vs the NX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e81a9/e81a95dee56151fd7aa85e54ab0598f9d89bec07" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 size comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FH22 and NX1 is 94 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0221/d022121b9907687d93360a2b16e4a96cae54f674" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FH22 and NX1.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FH22 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX1 will offer you extra detail using its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older FH22 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9920a/9920a7477b59472f4ec78f33cd9ff618411a9b77" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 sensor size comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c29d2/c29d2a98231df739cea5fbbe1356d8f044891d25" alt="Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Samsung NX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Samsung NX1 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FS33 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2014-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6480 x 4320 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 209 |
Cross focus points | - | 153 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 15.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.265 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 170 grams (0.37 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1363 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1900 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $1,500 |