Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Panasonic and Samsung. The image resolution of the FH22 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FH22 was launched 4 years prior to the WB30F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the FH22 scores vs the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FH22 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Samsung WB30F
| FH22 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Panasonic FH22
| WB30F | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung WB30F
| FH22 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Panasonic FH22 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the FH22 against the WB30F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FH22 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FH22 and WB30F.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB30F to give more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older FH22 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Samsung WB30F |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FS33 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 170g (0.37 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $200 | $180 |