Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS35
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Panasonic FH25 versus Ricoh WG-30, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the FH25 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FH25 was brought out 4 years prior to the WG-30 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the FH25 matches up versus the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 and Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH25 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Ricoh WG-30
FH25 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Panasonic FH25
WG-30 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 45 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH25 and Ricoh WG-30
FH25 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FH25 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FH25 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the FH25 vs the WG-30.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the FH25 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH25 and WG-30.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs however you should really take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged FH25 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS35 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine VI | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Screen LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $180 | $428 |