Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102
Portability
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Portability
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
Panasonic FH25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Panasonic FH25 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Panasonic and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the FH25 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FH25 was brought out 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the FH25 matches up against the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FH25 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Samsung SL102
| FH25 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Panasonic FH25
| SL102 | FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic FH25 and Samsung SL102
| FH25 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Panasonic FH25 enjoys outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FH25 versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the FH25 vs the SL102.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FH25 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FH25 and SL102.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic FH25 to provide more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger FH25 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Panasonic FH25 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Panasonic FH25 Street photography factors
Samsung SL102 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lighter than competitors in class (116 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Panasonic FH25 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Panasonic FH25
Travel photography with Samsung SL102
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
lighter than competitors in class (116g)
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Panasonic FH25 Landscape photography features
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography features
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
great maximum aperture (f)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Panasonic FH25
Vlogging with Samsung SL102
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
great maximum aperture (f)
has face detection focus
lighter than competitors in class (116 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FS35 | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine VI | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Screen LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $130 |
