Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photography Glossary Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FH27 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FH27 was revealed 4 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FH27 scores versus the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH27 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| FH27 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Panasonic FH27
| WG-M1 | FH27 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 44 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH27 and Ricoh WG-M1
| FH27 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH27 enjoys physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the FH27 compared to the WG-M1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FH27 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FH27 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic FH27 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older FH27 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine VI | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Touch Screen LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $229 | $2,000 |