Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Released August 2012
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Panasonic FH3 versus Pentax X-5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Pentax. The image resolution of the FH3 (14MP) and the X-5 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FH3 was introduced 3 years earlier than the X-5 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the FH3 scores against the X-5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 & Pentax X-5. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FH3 Gallery & Pentax X-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Pentax X-5
FH3 | X-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Panasonic FH3
X-5 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 31 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH3 and Pentax X-5
FH3 | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Panasonic FH3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Pentax X-5 has specifications of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") along with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FH3 versus Pentax X-5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the FH3 against the X-5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH3 and X-5 is 94 and 65 respectively.
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH3 and X-5.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Pentax X-5 to give more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older FH3 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FH3 vs Pentax X-5 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | Pentax X-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | Pentax X-5 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS11 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2012-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 22-580mm (26.4x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 230 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m | 9.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 165g (0.36 lb) | 595g (1.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $160 | $230 |